There is definite need to make overall socioeconomic development with more focus on health. This indicates the asymmetry of information and underscores the need of empowering the users Our study was also analyzed separately to study the effect of social exclusion on enrollment in RSBY. Stakeholder analysis was conducted in two parts. Government-Sponsored Health Insurance in India: The present study was part of the multicountry research project by Health Inc.

They carry out enrollment activities, print smart cards, process insurance claims, and do other administrative tasks. Feel that have been treated fairly because of your political beliefs, religion Wikimapia Commons and chooseindia. In this context, there are important questions like what is the level of awareness, enrollment, and utilization pattern among BPL population regarding RSBY? The survey was not large enough to provide reliable estimates for individual districts.

The research protocol was developed during December to April Six thousand HHs 29, individuals across 22 districts were covered through the quantitative HH survey in both rural cxse urban areas of Maharashtra. The HHs, who enrolled just because their community members enrolled, received little information from the enrolling agencies. In order to address the issue of non-response at the HH level, a replacement strategy was adopted to achieve the target number of completed interviews.

Comparison of demographic and background factors among caxe aware and not aware households as per their urban and rural background.


The most important is the poor planning of RSBY as it was planned at the national level without taking different social and cultural factors in Maharashtra, followed by the poor implementation by the Ministry of Labour in Maharashtra. Wikimapia Commons and chooseindia. An analysis of RSBY enrolment patterns: Discussion and conclusion The results of this study were quite similar to other studies done in the recent past.

Shahrawat R, Rao KD. How often do you attend religious gatherings?

RSBY scheme and Out of pocket expenditure – a Case Study from Chhattisgarh

The urban areas There is significant statistical difference for religion, caste, HH size, economic activity, type of family, and sex and education of the HH head. The objectives of the current paper are to assess the current status of RSBY in Maharashtra in terms of proportions covered at each step such as awareness, enrollment, renewal, having card, and utilization.

case study on rsby

Soc Change 43 2: Someone in the family a bank account holder Some HHs were unaware and never enrolled in the scheme even though the enrollment was quite high in the neighborhood. J Gokhale Inst Polit Econ 49 3—4: In tribal districts Nandurbar and Thaneone additional tribal PSU was selected for data collection.

Though the awareness, enrollment, and utilization are low among both the groups, the rural HHs are marginally better than the urban areas.

Rsby Scheme And Out Of Pocket Expenditure – A Case Study From Chhattisgarh

There are certain limitations of this paper worth mentioning. The selected districts thus represented different geographical regions in Maharashtra as follows: Funding The Health Inc.


case study on rsby

The Path to Universal Coverage. The essential SPEC factors at each level were also captured.

case study on rsby

The literature on RSBY by and large remains descriptive. In some other places, the awareness was better; however, detailed information was known to very few individuals.

The study followed mixed methods approach. They feel that if they are getting benefits of welfare programmes, then why to bother about the rest of the households. Initially, extensive review of literature was done followed by qualitative and quantitative methods to answer the research questions.

But they had not informed us. Catastrophic health expenditure remains a cause of impoverishment in the majority of the HHs in India 5.

The survey was not large enough to provide reliable estimates for individual districts. Quantitative Methods This helped us to quantify the extent of the exclusion at each step of implementation. The key informants and stakeholders also reinforced these findings.