It’s not a bad idea to start the letter by acknowledging the time and effort that the reviewers and possibly the editor have put into assessing the previous version of the manuscript. If the decision letter doesn’t make this clear, go ahead and ask the editor via e-mail. You ought to be in a cage. Sign up via email. After each comment state succinctly how you addressed the issue in the revision-what was changed and where.
You want to show them that you’ve given careful consideration to each comment even if you’ve chosen not to modify the manuscript in response to a particular point. We hope that you will be pleased with this revision and will finally recognize how urgently deserving of publication this work is. If you do accept it, however, we wish to thank you for your patience and wisdom throughout this process and to express our appreciation of your scholarly insights. A remark like “We look forward to hearing from you in due time regarding our submission and to respond to any further questions and comments you may have” is a better way to wind up your letter. Indeed, one was an essay on the Spanish-American War from a high school literary magazine.
These were on a variety of different topics, none of which had any relevance to our work that we could see. A final word of advice: To repay you, we would be happy to review some manuscripts for you; please send us the next manuscript that any of these reviewers submits to your journal.
If you have elected not to change the manuscript in lstter to a particular criticism or suggestion from the reviewers, explain why. Apr 14, You ought to be in a cage. The manuscript may still contain mistakes, but you’ve shown that you’ve done what you can to minimize them. Other suggestions were implemented, however, and the paper resjbmission improved and benefited. Journal of Educational and Social Research 5 2: One perplexing problem was dealing with suggestions by Reviewer Resubmlssion.
After each comment state succinctly how you addressed the issue in the revision-what was changed and where. If the decision letter doesn’t make this clear, go ahead and ask the editor via e-mail.
Tips for authors submitting a revised manuscript | Editage Insights
We even changed the goddamn running head! This content belongs to the Journal Submission Stage The journal submission stage can be challenging. After all, it is fairly clear that your reviewers are less interested in details of scientific procedure than in working out their personality problems and sexual frustrations by seeking some kind of demented glee in the sadistic and arbitrary exercise of tyrannical power over helpless authors like ourselves who happen to fall into their clutches.
Mnauscript not, then you are an unscrupulous, depraved monster with no shred of human decency. A journal’s editor may even want you to submit two versions of the revised manuscript: It’s not a bad idea to start the letter by acknowledging the time and effort that the reviewers and possibly the editor have put into assessing the previous version of the manuscript.
We have again rewritten the entire manuscript from start to finish.
You want to show them that you’ve given careful consideration to each comment even if you’ve chosen not to modify the manuscript in response to a particular point. Indeed, we have mailed letter bombs to four or five people we suspected of being reviewer C, so if you send the manuscript back to them the review process could be unduly delayed. Why don’t we give you complete access!
A sentence along the lines of “All spelling and grammatical errors pointed out by the reviewers have been corrected” suffices. The only common thread was that all 16 were by the same author, presumably someone whom Reviewer B greatly admires and feels should be more widely cited. If so, share it with your fellow researchers. One click sign-in with your social accounts.
Sample Cover Letter for Journal Manuscript Resubmissions – Academia Obscura
It’s not necessary to respond individually to each spelling or punctuation mistake, or similar trivial errors, that the reviewers or the editor indicated on the previous version of the paper. Recent Searches Cover letter Responding to reviewer comments Predatory publishers Research objectives Grant proposal Open access Plagiarism in research Journal selection tips Abstract Difference between thesis and letger article “Reject and Resubmit” status Scope and limitations Citations.
You’re looking to give wings to your academic career and publication journey.
Assuming you accept this paper, we would also like to add a footnote letyer your help with this manuscript and to point out that we liked the paper much better the way we originally wrote it but you held the editorial shotgun to our heads and forced us to chop, reshuffle, restate, hedge, expand, shorten, and in general convert a meaty paper into stir-fried vegetables. Sign up via email.
Submission Process Dos and don’ts for a manuzcript cover letter Read. For example, if as review C suggested several of my recent ancestors were indeed drawn from other species, it is too late to change that.
Leave a Reply Cancel reply Your email address will not be published. If you do accept it, however, we wish to thank you for your patience and wisdom throughout this process and to express our appreciation of your scholarly insights. Hopefully we have suffered enough by now to satisfy even you covre your bloodthirsty reviewers.
Goldman An experienced journal editor who feels strongly about issues resubbmission peer review and is proactive in discussing these issues with authors and others interested in publication.